Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

1.5k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry usually cover Oral Surgery (792 papers), Orthodontics (384 papers) and Periodontics (299 papers) specifically the topics of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (284 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (265 papers) and Dental materials and restorations (232 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry are Maryam Khoroushi, Priya Subramaniam, Jayachandran Sadaksharam, Vijay Kumar Chava, Neelam Mittal, S Gheena, Arathi Rao, Sangeeta Palaskar, Rucha Shah and Arthur Kemoli.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Clinical Dentistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Clinical Dentistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025