Comparative Cytogenetics

506 papers and 4.2k indexed citations

About

The 506 papers published in Comparative Cytogenetics in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Cytogenetics usually cover Plant Science (351 papers), Molecular Biology (195 papers) and Genetics (190 papers) specifically the topics of Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (321 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (102 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Cytogenetics are Vladimir A. Lukhtanov, Lorenzo Peruzzi, Valentina G. Kuznetsova, Halil Erhan Eroğlu, Boris A. Anokhin, Snejana Grozeva, Н. В. Голуб, Vladimir E. Gokhman, Cláudio Oliveira and Orlando Moreira‐Filho.

In The Last Decade

Comparative Cytogenetics

477 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Comparative Cytogenetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Cytogenetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Cytogenetics.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Cytogenetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Cytogenetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Cytogenetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Cytogenetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026