Coloration Technology

1.4k papers and 19.4k indexed citations

About

The 1.4k papers published in Coloration Technology in the last decades have received a total of 19.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Coloration Technology usually cover Building and Construction (843 papers), Organic Chemistry (309 papers) and Polymers and Plastics (259 papers) specifically the topics of Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (833 papers), Color Science and Applications (228 papers) and Textile materials and evaluations (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Coloration Technology are David M. Lewis, I. Holme, Robert Christie, Keith R. Millington, Mauro Banchero, Idil Arslan‐Alaton, Peter J. Hauser, Richard S. Blackburn, Rashmi Sanghi and Chi Wai Kan.

In The Last Decade

Coloration Technology

1.3k papers receiving 18.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Coloration Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Coloration Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Coloration Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Coloration Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Coloration Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Coloration Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coloration Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026