Clinical Imaging

4.7k papers and 44.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Clinical Imaging in the last decades have received a total of 44.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Imaging usually cover Surgery (1.8k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.4k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of MRI in cancer diagnosis (387 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (306 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Imaging are Antonio F. Govoni, Elliot K. Fishman, Stavroula J. Theodorou, Daphné J. Theodorou, Adam Jacobi, Corey Eber, Claudia I. Henschke, Adam Bernheim, Michael Chung and Donald Resnick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Imaging.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Imaging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025