Clinical Diabetes

866 papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 866 papers published in Clinical Diabetes in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Diabetes usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (676 papers), Surgery (174 papers) and Genetics (152 papers) specifically the topics of Diabetes Management and Research (443 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (237 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (202 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Diabetes are Michael J. Fowler, Martha M. Funnell, Alan M. Delamater, Robert M. Anderson, Andrew J.M. Boulton, Elizabeth H. Harris, Edward C. Chao, Steven V. Edelman, John R. White and Tom A. Elasy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Diabetes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Diabetes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Diabetes.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Diabetes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Diabetes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Diabetes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Diabetes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025