Colonial Latin American Review

482 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 482 papers published in Colonial Latin American Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Colonial Latin American Review usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (264 papers), Demography (151 papers) and Anthropology (147 papers) specifically the topics of Latin American history and culture (264 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (142 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Colonial Latin American Review are Alex Borucki, Carolyn Dean, Elizabeth Anne Kuznesof, Asunción Lavrín, Stuart B. Schwartz, Camilla Townsend, Karen B. Graubart, Kris Lane, Catherine Julien and David Tavárez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Colonial Latin American Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Colonial Latin American Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Colonial Latin American Review.

Countries where authors publish in Colonial Latin American Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Colonial Latin American Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Colonial Latin American Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colonial Latin American Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025