Canadian Historical Review

1.4k papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Canadian Historical Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Canadian Historical Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (995 papers), Political Science and International Relations (201 papers) and History (197 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Identity and History (881 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (181 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Canadian Historical Review are J. M. S. Careless, Ian McKay, Tina Loo, Veronica Strong‐Boag, Joan Sangster, Ian Milligan, Joy Parr, Desmond Morton, Ruth Phillips and John Sandlos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Canadian Historical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian Historical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian Historical Review.

Countries where authors publish in Canadian Historical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian Historical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian Historical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Historical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025