Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

164.4k citations
6.2k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

5.9k papers receiving 157.5k citations

Peers

Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Water Science and Technology 26.4k
  • Catalysis 12.9k
  • Biomedical Engineering 59.8k
  • Mechanical Engineering 50.7k
  • Computational Mechanics 24.5k
Replace The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering with:
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering Canada
Chemical Engineering & Technology Germany
Computers & Chemical Engineering United States
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers China
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering South Korea
Process Safety and Environmental Protection China
Processes China
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering China
Chemical Engineering Communications United States
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN Japan
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification relative to The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering Canada The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification.

About Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

The 6.2k papers published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification in the last decades have received a total of 164.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification usually cover Catalysis (517 papers), Water Science and Technology (974 papers), Biomedical Engineering (2.6k papers), Computational Mechanics (1.2k papers) and Mechanical Engineering (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Process Optimization and Integration (842 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (679 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (638 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (546 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (409 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (365 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (349 papers) and Granular flow and fluidized beds (343 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification are W. Käst, Holger Martin, Parag R. Gogate, K.‐H. Zum Gahr, Hans Müller‐Steinhagen, Mohammad‐Hossein Sarrafzadeh, E.‐U. Schlünder, Shirish H. Sonawane, Mohammad Reza Rahimpour and Andrzej Stankiewicz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact