Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine

6.7k citations
549 papers · · active since 1991

Impact in

Papers in

Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine

500 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Reproductive Medicine 3.3k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 426
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 503
  • Immunology 457
Replace JBRA with:
JBRA Brazil
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine United States
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences India
The EPMA Journal China
Advances in clinical chemistry United States
Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation United States
North American Journal of Medical Sciences India
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction India
Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics India
Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica Poland
Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine relative to JBRA Brazil JBRA's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
JBRA · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine.

About Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine

The 549 papers published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine usually cover Reproductive Medicine (322 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (201 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (59 papers), Obstetrics and Gynecology (34 papers) and Drug Discovery (1 paper) specifically the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (191 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (148 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (90 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (79 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (45 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (27 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (23 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Daehan saengsik uihak hoeji/Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine are Ahmed T Alahmar, Byung Chul Jee, Myung Chan Gye, Seok Hyun Kim, Woo Sik Lee, Tae Ki Yoon, In Ok Song, Chan Woo Park, Jin Yeong Kim and Kwang Moon Yang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact