Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics

29.1k citations
635 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies 111
    • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 66
    • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise 51
    • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 40
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 119

Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics

633 papers receiving 28.6k citations

Peers

Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 12.5k
  • Cancer Research 3.8k
  • Molecular Biology 13.0k
  • Genetics 4.4k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 2.2k
Replace Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences with:
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences United States
Angiogenesis United States
JACC Basic to Translational Science United States
Seminars in Immunopathology United States
Advances in clinical chemistry United States
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research United States
Advances in immunology United States
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal South Korea
Biology of Sex Differences United States
Cardiovascular Therapeutics China
Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics relative to Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences United States Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics.

About Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics

The 635 papers published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 29.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (293 papers), Genetics (171 papers), Molecular Biology (306 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (67 papers) and Cancer Research (58 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (119 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (111 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (66 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (55 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (51 papers), Congenital heart defects research (49 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (45 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics are Christopher Semsarian, Pasi Soininen, Mika Ala‐Korpela, Guillaume Paré, Antti J. Kangas, Peter Würtz, Teemu Suna, Paul M. Ridker, Daniel I. Chasman and Manuel Mayr.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact