Building Acoustics

552 papers and 4.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 552 papers published in Building Acoustics in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Building Acoustics usually cover Biomedical Engineering (334 papers), Speech and Hearing (285 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (212 papers) specifically the topics of Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (334 papers), Noise Effects and Management (285 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (210 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Building Acoustics are Jian Kang, Bridget Shield, Julie Dockrell, Francesco Asdrubali, Kirill V. Horoshenkov, Samuele Schiavoni, Gino Iannace, Kiri Mealings, D.J. Oldham and Delphine Bard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Building Acoustics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Building Acoustics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Building Acoustics.

Countries where authors publish in Building Acoustics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Building Acoustics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Building Acoustics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Building Acoustics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025