Boundary Value Problems

19.7k citations
2.5k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
    • Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
    • Differential Equations and Boundary Problems
    • Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations

Papers in

    • Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis 1.0k
    • Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations 675
    • Differential Equations and Boundary Problems 494
    • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions 510

Boundary Value Problems

2.2k papers receiving 18.4k citations

Peers

Boundary Value Problems
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Modeling and Simulation 7.8k
  • Applied Mathematics 12.8k
  • Numerical Analysis 6.1k
  • Mathematical Physics 3.2k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 4.0k
Replace Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing with:
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing China
AIMS Mathematics China
Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B China
Computational and Applied Mathematics China
Acta Mathematica Scientia China
Differential Equations Russia
Communications on Pure &amp Applied Analysis China
The Journal of Difference Equations and Applications United States
Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics China
Fractal and Fractional China
Boundary Value Problems relative to Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing China Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Boundary Value Problems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Boundary Value Problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Boundary Value Problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boundary Value Problems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Boundary Value Problems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Boundary Value Problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Boundary Value Problems.

About Boundary Value Problems

The 2.5k papers published in Boundary Value Problems in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Boundary Value Problems usually cover Applied Mathematics (1.7k papers), Modeling and Simulation (561 papers), Numerical Analysis (696 papers), Mathematical Physics (649 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (827 papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (1.0k papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (760 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (675 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (593 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (510 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (494 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (430 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (348 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Boundary Value Problems are Dumitru Bǎleanu, F.D. GAKHOV, Juan J. Nieto, Bashir Ahmad, Shahram Rezapour, Lishan Liu, Precious Sibanda, Stanford Shateyi, Yujun Cui and Ravi P. Agarwal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact