Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry

76.5k citations
4.1k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
    • Radical Photochemical Reactions
    • Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
    • Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
    • Fluorine in Organic Chemistry

Papers in

    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 485
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 401
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 367
    • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 320
    • Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions 274
    • Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 269
    • Fluorine in Organic Chemistry 272

Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry

3.9k papers receiving 72.3k citations

Peers

Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Organic Chemistry 49.1k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 6.7k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 8.4k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 1.6k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 2.5k
Replace Chinese Journal of Chemistry with:
Chinese Journal of Chemistry China
Current Organic Chemistry China
Russian Chemical Bulletin Russia
Russian Chemical Reviews Russia
Organic Process Research & Development United States
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society South Korea
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly Austria
ChemistrySelect India
Chinese Chemical Letters China
Organic Chemistry Frontiers China
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry relative to Chinese Journal of Chemistry China Chinese Journal of Chemistry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Chinese Journal of Chemistry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry.

About Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry

The 4.1k papers published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 76.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry usually cover Organic Chemistry (2.9k papers), Pharmaceutical Science (325 papers), Inorganic Chemistry (336 papers), Spectroscopy (317 papers) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (171 papers) specifically the topics of Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (522 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (485 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (401 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (367 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (320 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (274 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (272 papers) and Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (269 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry are Ian R. Baxendale, Marcus Baumann, Magnus Rueping, Burkhard Koenig, Luke Hunter, Boris Johannes Nachtsheim, Jonathan Clayden, Sumudu P. Leelananda, Steffen Lindert and Philipp Gütlich.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact