Countries where authors publish in Materials Today Bio
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Materials Today Bio. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Materials Today Bio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Materials Today Bio more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Materials Today Bio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Materials Today Bio.
About Materials Today Bio
The 2.5k papers published in Materials Today Bio in the last decades have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Materials Today Bio usually cover Biomaterials (592 papers), Rehabilitation (178 papers), Biomedical Engineering (1.2k papers), Molecular Medicine (94 papers) and Pharmaceutical Science (90 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (455 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (358 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (323 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (282 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (190 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (177 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (165 papers) and Extracellular vesicles in disease (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Materials Today Bio are Diego Mantovani, Yikun Ju, Bairong Fang, Yang Pu, Xiaoyan Xie, Yue Hu, Ali Khademhosseini, Nureddin Ashammakhi, C. F. Xu and María Vallet‐Regí.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.