a/b Auto/Biography Studies

639 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 639 papers published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (286 papers), Sociology and Political Science (202 papers) and History (132 papers) specifically the topics of Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (178 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (44 papers) and Biographical and Historical Analysis (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in a/b Auto/Biography Studies are Sidonie Smith, Donna Haraway, Faith Wambura Ngunjiri, Elisabeth El Refaie, Kathy-Ann C. Hernandez, Heewon Chang, Michael Lackey, Kate Douglas, G. Thomas Couser and Judith Halberstam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies.

Countries where authors publish in a/b Auto/Biography Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in a/b Auto/Biography Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites a/b Auto/Biography Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025