Countries where authors publish in Architectural Theory Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Architectural Theory Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Architectural Theory Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Architectural Theory Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Architectural Theory Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Architectural Theory Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Architectural Theory Review.
About Architectural Theory Review
The 382 papers published in Architectural Theory Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Architectural Theory Review usually cover Architecture (73 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (77 papers), Conservation (33 papers), Urban Studies (28 papers) and Archeology (43 papers) specifically the topics of Architecture, Modernity, and Design (49 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (31 papers), Architecture, Design, and Social History (30 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (29 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (24 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (23 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (17 papers) and Architecture, Art, Education (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Architectural Theory Review are John Stanislav Sadar, Kjetil Fallan, Adrian Snodgrass, Richard Coyne, Joseph Pugliese, Hilde Heynen, Michael J. Ostwald, Peter Bishop, Michael Davis and Manuel DeLanda.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.