Asian Herpetological Research

220 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 220 papers published in Asian Herpetological Research in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Herpetological Research usually cover Global and Planetary Change (137 papers), Genetics (86 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (65 papers) specifically the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (136 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (52 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Herpetological Research are Annemarie Ohler, James F. Parham, Chris R. Feldman, Jianping Jiang, Xiang Ji, Ying-Yong Wang, Daesik Park, Pipeng Li, Song Huang and Rafe M. Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Herpetological Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Herpetological Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Herpetological Research.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Herpetological Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Herpetological Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Herpetological Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Herpetological Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025