Archivos de Bronconeumología

6.9k papers and 48.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.9k papers published in Archivos de Bronconeumología in the last decades have received a total of 48.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Archivos de Bronconeumología usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.3k papers), Physiology (1.6k papers) and Surgery (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (1.4k papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (875 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (836 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archivos de Bronconeumología are Marc Miravitlles, Juan José Soler‐Cataluña, Myriam Calle, Miguel Ángel Martínez‐García, Julio Ancochea, Francisco García‐Río, Joan B. Soriano, José Luís Izquierdo Alonso, Vicente Plaza and Julio Sánchez de Cos Escuín.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archivos de Bronconeumología

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archivos de Bronconeumología. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archivos de Bronconeumología.

Countries where authors publish in Archivos de Bronconeumología

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archivos de Bronconeumología. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archivos de Bronconeumología with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archivos de Bronconeumología more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025