Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B
344 papers
receiving
4.1k citations
Peers
Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
Geophysics2.4k
Geochemistry and Petrology978
Artificial Intelligence2.2k
Geology161
Environmental Chemistry281
Replace Exploration and Mining Geology with:
Exploration and Mining GeologyCanada
Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie - Abhandlungen Journal of Mineralogy and GeochemistryHungary
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part A Solid Earth and GeodesyGermany
Geochemical Perspectives LettersUnited States
Earth Science FrontiersChina
China GeologyChina
Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and GeochemistryChina
Geologica BelgicaBelgium
Italian Journal of GeosciencesItaly
Geologia CroaticaCroatia
Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section Brelative toExploration and Mining GeologyCanadaExploration and Mining Geology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Exploration and Mining Geology · 1×
×0.82k/3kGEOPH
×1.2978/801GP
×0.92k/3kAI
×1.6161/103GEOLO
×1.9281/146EC
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B
This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B.
About Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B
The 365 papers published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B usually cover Geophysics (210 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (59 papers), Artificial Intelligence (227 papers), Geology (19 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (87 papers) specifically the topics of Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (227 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (191 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (64 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (50 papers), Mining Techniques and Economics (43 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (38 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (28 papers) and Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B are Judith A. Kinnaird, Iain McDonald, Simon M. Jowitt, I. Garba, Marat Abzalov, Gavin M. Mudd, Simon Dominy, Iain Pitcairn, J. M. F. Clout and G. Neil Phillips.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.