Anti-Trafficking Review

196 papers and 963 indexed citations i.

About

The 196 papers published in Anti-Trafficking Review in the last decades have received a total of 963 indexed citations. Papers published in Anti-Trafficking Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (186 papers), Political Science and International Relations (32 papers) and Epidemiology (31 papers) specifically the topics of Sex work and related issues (168 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (32 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anti-Trafficking Review are Anne T. Gallagher, Meena Seshu, May‐Len Skilbrei, Emma Samman, Janie A. Chuang, Kamala Kempadoo, Nicole A. Molinari, Rebecca Surtees, Louise Waite and Hannah Lewis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anti-Trafficking Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anti-Trafficking Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anti-Trafficking Review.

Countries where authors publish in Anti-Trafficking Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anti-Trafficking Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anti-Trafficking Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anti-Trafficking Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025