Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

982 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 982 papers published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine usually cover Surgery (533 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (410 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (189 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (394 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (216 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (166 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine are Farnad Imani, Saeid Safari, Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz, Poupak Rahimzadeh, Alan D. Kaye, Hassan Soleimanpour, Aidan Byrne, Ali Dabbagh, Valiollah Hassani and Samad EJ Golzari.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025