Countries where authors publish in Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Laboratory Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine.
About Annals of Laboratory Medicine
The 1.8k papers published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Annals of Laboratory Medicine usually cover Hematology (280 papers), Molecular Medicine (108 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (110 papers), Infectious Diseases (251 papers) and Endocrinology (69 papers) specifically the topics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (121 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (108 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (95 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (77 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (65 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (58 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (56 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Laboratory Medicine are Michael Meisner, Cas W. Weykamp, Robert C. Hawkins, Chang‐Seok Ki, Kyungwon Lee, Dongeun Yong, Young Ho Lee, Mina Hur, Seok Hoon Jeong and Duck Cho.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.