BMC Medical Imaging

1.7k papers and 19.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in BMC Medical Imaging in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Medical Imaging usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (901 papers), Surgery (356 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (344 papers) specifically the topics of Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (382 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (169 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Medical Imaging are Abdel Aziz Taha, Allan Hanbury, Håkan Arheden, Martin Ugander, Marcus Carlsson, Einar Heiberg, Henrik Engblom, Andreas Kjær, Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen and Tina Binderup.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Medical Imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Medical Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Medical Imaging.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Medical Imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Medical Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Medical Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Medical Imaging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025