African Geographical Review

396 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 396 papers published in African Geographical Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in African Geographical Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (117 papers), Global and Planetary Change (88 papers) and Urban Studies (81 papers) specifically the topics of Urban and Rural Development Challenges (79 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (38 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in African Geographical Review are Jane Battersby, William G. Moseley, Hanson Nyantakyi‐Frimpong, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Sarah L. Smiley, Isaac Luginaah, Steven Lawrence Gordon, Kwadwo Owusu, Raymond Asare Tutu and Clifford Amoako.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in African Geographical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in African Geographical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in African Geographical Review.

Countries where authors publish in African Geographical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in African Geographical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in African Geographical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites African Geographical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025