Annals of Functional Analysis

582 papers and 2.4k indexed citations

About

The 582 papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis usually cover Applied Mathematics (415 papers), Mathematical Physics (306 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (164 papers) specifically the topics of Holomorphic and Operator Theory (171 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (132 papers) and Advanced Banach Space Theory (131 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Functional Analysis are Zoubir Dahmani, Krzysztof Ciepliński, Bessem Samet, Calogero Vetro, Emrah Evren Kara, Metin Başarır, Fuad Kıttaneh, Mansoor Saburov, Arun Kajla and Rajna Rajić.

In The Last Decade

Annals of Functional Analysis

429 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Functional Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Functional Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Functional Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026