This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Adicciones. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Adicciones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adicciones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Adicciones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Adicciones.
About Adicciones
The 989 papers published in Adicciones in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Adicciones usually cover Epidemiology (511 papers), Demography (90 papers), Clinical Psychology (137 papers), Toxicology (30 papers) and Pharmacology (65 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (479 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (97 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (90 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (61 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (60 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (50 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (48 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Adicciones are Elisardo Becoña, Enrique Echeburúa, Eduardo J. Pedrero Pérez, Jose Luis Ventura Leon, Amador Calafat, Paz de Corral, Yury Razvodovsky, Xavier Carbonell, Julio Bobes and Marta Torrens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.