Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art

250 papers and 151 indexed citations i.

About

The 250 papers published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art in the last decades have received a total of 151 indexed citations. Papers published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art usually cover Archeology (81 papers), Classics (79 papers) and History (54 papers) specifically the topics of Byzantine Studies and History (72 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (39 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art are A. V. Andreev, Natalya Panova, А. А. Новиков, S. Klimenko, Mikhail Zhizhin and Maria Chernysheva.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art.

Countries where authors publish in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025