Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum

2.0k papers and 24.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum in the last decades have received a total of 24.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum usually cover Neurology (1.1k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (410 papers) and Surgery (350 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (635 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (365 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (283 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum are John H. Zhang, Thomas A. Gennarelli, Richard F. Keep, Marek Czosnyka, Ya Hua, Robert Ayer, Guohua Xi, H. Millesi, Jiping Tang and Y. Katayama.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

Countries where authors publish in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025