Acta comportamentalia.

339 papers and 613 indexed citations i.

About

The 339 papers published in Acta comportamentalia. in the last decades have received a total of 613 indexed citations. Papers published in Acta comportamentalia. usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 papers), Education (48 papers) and Clinical Psychology (32 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral and Psychological Studies (61 papers), Linguistics and Education Research (16 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta comportamentalia. are Emilio Ribes Iñesta, Emilio Ribes‐Iñesta, Carla Cristina Paiva Paracampo, Júlio C. de Rose, Deisy das Graças de Souza, Emilio Ribes, Luiz Carlos de Albuquerque, María Amélia Matos, Gerson Yukio Tomanari and Emmanuel Zagury Tourinho.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta comportamentalia.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta comportamentalia.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta comportamentalia..

Countries where authors publish in Acta comportamentalia.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta comportamentalia.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta comportamentalia. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta comportamentalia. more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025