American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

491 citations
332 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism 16
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 9
    • Themes in Literature Analysis 8
    • American and British Literature Analysis 6
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis 6
    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 5
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 5

American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

60 papers receiving 89 citations

Peers

American book review/˜The œAmerican book review
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Literature and Literary Theory 85
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 33
  • Business and International Management 8
  • Cultural Studies 30
  • Ecology 85
Replace NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin with:
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin Germany
British Journal of Canadian Studies Australia
Law Culture and the Humanities United States
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences China
Les Temps Modernes France
Space and Culture India India
eTropic electronic journal of studies in the tropics Australia
Historia Chile
Cahiers des Amériques latines France
Narodna umjetnost Croatia
American book review/˜The œAmerican book review relative to NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin Germany NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American book review/˜The œAmerican book review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review.

About American book review/˜The œAmerican book review

The 332 papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review in the last decades have received a total of 491 indexed citations . Papers published in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (61 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (10 papers), Cultural Studies (14 papers), Philosophy (17 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (4 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (16 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (9 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (8 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (8 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (6 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (5 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (5 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American book review/˜The œAmerican book review are Mary Beth Miller, Graeme Macdonald, Thomas H. March, Bruce Robbins, Rita Felski, Jennifer Wenzel, Ursula K. Heise, Daniel J. Leary, Jayna Brown and Imre Szemán.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact