World Wildlife Fund
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Marine and fisheries research
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 115
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 194
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 92
- Marine and fisheries research 83
- Top scholars
- Taylor H. RickettsBernhard LehnerRobin NaidooPetra DöllEric DinersteinDavid M. OlsonAndrew BalmfordNeil D. Burgess
- Journals
- Conservation Biology (52 papers)Biological Conservation (48 papers)Conservation Letters (31 papers)Oryx (26 papers)Marine Policy (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
World Wildlife Fund
923 papers receiving 79.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Ecological Modeling 8.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 35.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 16.5k
- Ecology 32.7k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 9.5k
Countries citing scholars working at World Wildlife Fund
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at World Wildlife Fund. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at World Wildlife Fund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Wildlife Fund more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at World Wildlife Fund
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with World Wildlife Fund at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with World Wildlife Fund at the time of their publication.
About World Wildlife Fund
In recent decades, authors affiliated with World Wildlife Fund have published 999 papers, which have received a total of 81.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 115 papers in Ecological Modeling, 432 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 509 papers in Ecology, 192 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 142 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (208 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (194 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (115 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (111 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (99 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (95 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (92 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (83 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (8.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (35.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (16.5k citations), Ecology (32.7k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (9.5k citations). Authors at World Wildlife Fund collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation, Conservation Letters, Oryx and Marine Policy. Some of World Wildlife Fund's most productive authors include Taylor H. Ricketts, Bernhard Lehner, Robin Naidoo, Petra Döll, Eric Dinerstein, David M. Olson, Andrew Balmford, Neil D. Burgess, Michael B. Mascia and Lara J. Hansen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.