World Trade Organization

18.0k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

World Trade Organization

1.2k papers receiving 15.9k citations

Peers

World Trade Organization
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6.3k
  • Development 1.8k
  • Strategy and Management 5.6k
  • Business and International Management 450
  • Economics and Econometrics 5.6k
Replace International Labour Organization with:
International Labour Organization Switzerland
German Institute of Development and Sustainability Germany
Economie Publique France
Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales France
Centre for European Policy Studies Belgium
Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne France
Aix-Marseille Sciences Economiques France
Netherlands Institute for Social Research Netherlands
Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Économie, Gestion France
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Italy
World Trade Organization relative to International Labour Organization Switzerland International Labour Organization's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
International Labour Organization · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at World Trade Organization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at World Trade Organization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at World Trade Organization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Trade Organization more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at World Trade Organization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with World Trade Organization at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with World Trade Organization at the time of their publication.

About World Trade Organization

In recent decades, authors affiliated with World Trade Organization have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 606 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 157 papers in Development, 433 papers in Strategy and Management, 464 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 393 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Global trade and economics (574 papers), World Trade Organization Law (364 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (192 papers), International Development and Aid (157 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (127 papers), International Business and FDI (112 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (67 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (61 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (6.3k citations), Development (1.8k citations), Strategy and Management (5.6k citations), Business and International Management (450 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (5.6k citations). Authors at World Trade Organization collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including World Economy, World Trade Review, Journal of International Economic Law, The Journal of World Intellectual Property and Journal of Economic Integration. Some of World Trade Organization's most productive authors include Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, Roberta Piermartini, Manfred Elsig, Ludger Schuknecht, Zdeněk Drábek, Michèle Ruta, Valentina Rollo, Deborah Elms, Marc Auboin and Matthias Helble.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact