Worcester Polytechnic Institute

14.7k papers receiving 416.7k citations

Peers

Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Management Science and Operations Research 26.2k
  • Computer Science Applications 11.1k
  • Strategy and Management 29.2k
  • Management Information Systems 16.0k
  • Artificial Intelligence 47.4k
Replace Northeastern University with:
Northeastern University United States
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute United States
IIT@MIT United States
Stevens Institute of Technology United States
New Jersey Institute of Technology United States
Concordia University Canada
Drexel University United States
University of Massachusetts Lowell United States
Polytechnique Montréal Canada
Old Dominion University United States
Worcester Polytechnic Institute relative to Northeastern University United States Northeastern University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Northeastern University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Worcester Polytechnic Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Worcester Polytechnic Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute at the time of their publication.

About Worcester Polytechnic Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute have published 16.3k papers, which have received a total of 437.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 429 papers in Computer Science Applications, 112 papers in Architecture, 1.4k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 1.8k papers in Artificial Intelligence and 551 papers in Signal Processing on the topics of Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (325 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (268 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (263 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (256 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (250 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (231 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (227 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (194 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Science and Operations Research (26.2k citations), Computer Science Applications (11.1k citations), Strategy and Management (29.2k citations), Management Information Systems (16.0k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (47.4k citations). Authors at Worcester Polytechnic Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including European Journal of Operational Research, Scientific Reports, International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and The Journal of Chemical Physics. Some of Worcester Polytechnic Institute's most productive authors include Joseph Sarkis, Joe Zhu, Wenjing Lou, Erwin Danneels, L. R. Ram‐Mohan, Diane M. Strong, Kui Ren, Kaveh Pahlavan, Anthony G. Dixon and A.E. Emanuel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact