WorldFish

57.4k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

WorldFish

1.3k papers receiving 57.3k citations

Peers

WorldFish
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9.6k
  • Aquatic Science 6.1k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 8.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 13.1k
  • Ecology 8.9k
Replace Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City with:
Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Indonesia
Center for International Forestry Research Indonesia
Vietnam National University of Agriculture Vietnam
Maejo University Thailand
International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Sri Lanka
Gazipur Agricultural University Bangladesh
Sylhet Agricultural University Bangladesh
Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Philippines
Patuakhali Science and Technology University Bangladesh
WorldFish relative to Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33.6×
Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at WorldFish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at WorldFish. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at WorldFish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites WorldFish more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at WorldFish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with WorldFish at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with WorldFish at the time of their publication.

About WorldFish

In recent decades, authors affiliated with WorldFish have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 57.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 345 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 176 papers in Aquatic Science, 177 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 249 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 26 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology on the topics of Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies (286 papers), Marine and fisheries research (160 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (150 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (127 papers), Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (117 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (88 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (85 papers) and Marine and Coastal Ecosystems (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (9.6k citations), Aquatic Science (6.1k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (8.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (13.1k citations) and Ecology (8.9k citations). Authors at WorldFish collaborate with scholars in Malaysia, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Aquaculture, Marine Policy, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems and Reviews in Aquaculture. Some of WorldFish's most productive authors include Edward H. Allison, Ben Belton, Christophe Béné, Shakuntala H. Thilsted, Neil L. Andrew, Philippa J. Cohen, Raúl Walter Ponzoni, Max Fredrik Troell, Michael John Phillips and Stephen J. Hall.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact