University of Wolverhampton

8.5k papers receiving 219.4k citations

Peers

University of Wolverhampton
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 11.1k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 6.1k
  • Rehabilitation 3.4k
  • Information Systems 12.1k
  • Artificial Intelligence 14.4k
Replace Coventry University with:
Coventry University United Kingdom
University of Salford United Kingdom
Brunel University of London United Kingdom
Manchester Metropolitan University United Kingdom
Nottingham Trent University United Kingdom
University of Portsmouth United Kingdom
Northumbria University United Kingdom
Liverpool John Moores University United Kingdom
University of the West of England United Kingdom
University of Huddersfield United Kingdom
University of Wolverhampton relative to Coventry University United Kingdom Coventry University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Coventry University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Wolverhampton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Wolverhampton. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Wolverhampton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Wolverhampton more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Wolverhampton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Wolverhampton at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Wolverhampton at the time of their publication.

About University of Wolverhampton

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Wolverhampton have published 9.1k papers, which have received a total of 219.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 302 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 193 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 484 papers in Information Systems, 56 papers in Research and Theory and 98 papers in Rehabilitation on the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (282 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (227 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (168 papers), Sports Performance and Training (143 papers), Physical Activity and Health (127 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (124 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (115 papers) and Diversity and Impact of Dance (109 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (11.1k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (6.1k citations), Rehabilitation (3.4k citations), Information Systems (12.1k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (14.4k citations). Authors at University of Wolverhampton collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Scientometrics, Journal of Sports Sciences, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, PLoS ONE and Engineering Construction & Architectural Management. Some of University of Wolverhampton's most productive authors include Mike A Thelwall, Alan Michael Nevill, Christina Goulding, John M. Traxler, Yiannis Koutedakis, Andrew M. Lane, Kayvan Kousha, Jamal Khatib, Pervaiz K. Ahmed and Paul Olaniyi Olomolaiye.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact