Washington and Jefferson College

10.7k citations
409 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Washington and Jefferson College

370 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Peers

Washington and Jefferson College
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Water Science and Technology 607
  • Spectroscopy 535
Replace Roanoke College with:
Roanoke College United States
Washington College United States
Randolph–Macon College United States
Baldwin Wallace University United States
Hiram College United States
Hood College United States
Harrisburg University of Science and Technology United States
University of Mount Union United States
Hanover College United States
Mercyhurst University United States
Washington and Jefferson College relative to Roanoke College United States Roanoke College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.1×
Roanoke College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Washington and Jefferson College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Washington and Jefferson College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Washington and Jefferson College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Washington and Jefferson College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Washington and Jefferson College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Washington and Jefferson College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Washington and Jefferson College at the time of their publication.

About Washington and Jefferson College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Washington and Jefferson College have published 409 papers, which have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in General Energy, 44 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11 papers in Computer Science Applications, 28 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 26 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (22 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (20 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (9 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Water Science and Technology (607 citations) and Spectroscopy (535 citations). Authors at Washington and Jefferson College collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Infant Behavior and Development, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, The Astronomical Journal and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. Some of Washington and Jefferson College's most productive authors include Paul C. Quinn, Peter D. Eimas, Robert C. Litchfield, William D. Foland, Alan M. Slater, Robbie J. Iuliucci, JoAnn Chirico, Denis Mareschal B, Olivier Pascalis and Fran Smith.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact