Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery

77.3k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery

1.7k papers receiving 72.4k citations

Peers

Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Biomaterials 8.8k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.6k
  • Polymers and Plastics 5.5k
  • Biomedical Engineering 16.8k
  • Molecular Biology 21.2k
Replace Medical Protective with:
Medical Protective United States
IIT Research Institute United States
Highland Community College - Illinois United States
Zimmer Biomet (United States) United States
South College United States
Office of Science United States
South University United States
Research Manitoba Canada
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences United States
Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States) United States
Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery relative to Medical Protective United States Medical Protective's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.4×
Medical Protective · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery at the time of their publication.

About Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 77.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 153 papers in Biomaterials, 31 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 539 papers in Molecular Biology, 106 papers in Polymers and Plastics and 39 papers in Numerical Analysis on the topics of Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (81 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (66 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (63 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (59 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (53 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (53 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (51 papers) and biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (45 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biomaterials (8.8k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.6k citations), Polymers and Plastics (5.5k citations), Biomedical Engineering (16.8k citations) and Molecular Biology (21.2k citations). Authors at Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Mathematical Programming. Some of Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery's most productive authors include Shaoqin Gong, David J. Beebe, Lih‐Sheng Turng, John M. Denu, Hao‐Yang Mi, Xin Jing, Eric K. Sackmann, Edmond W. K. Young, John E. Kutzbach and Stephen C. Porter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact