Wolfson Foundation

58.1k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Wolfson Foundation

1.0k papers receiving 52.3k citations

Peers

Wolfson Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Developmental Neuroscience 2.5k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 9.6k
  • Neurology 2.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 6.1k
  • Physiology 6.2k
Replace MRC Cancer Unit with:
MRC Cancer Unit United Kingdom
Brain Physiology Lab France
Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Biologie France
MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences United Kingdom
Laboratoire d’immunologie intégrative du cancer France
Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell United Kingdom
Fondation de l'Avenir France
MRC Prion Unit United Kingdom
Lambeth Hospital United Kingdom
Ludwig Cancer Research United Kingdom
Wolfson Foundation relative to MRC Cancer Unit United Kingdom MRC Cancer Unit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
MRC Cancer Unit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wolfson Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wolfson Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wolfson Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfson Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wolfson Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wolfson Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wolfson Foundation at the time of their publication.

About Wolfson Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wolfson Foundation have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 58.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 32 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 130 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 112 papers in Physiology, 36 papers in Neurology and 77 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (66 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (51 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (37 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (34 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (31 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (31 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (31 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Neuroscience (2.5k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (9.6k citations), Neurology (2.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.1k citations) and Physiology (6.2k citations). Authors at Wolfson Foundation collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Neuroscience, British Journal of Pharmacology, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Neuroscience. Some of Wolfson Foundation's most productive authors include Salvador Moncada, James P. Barber, Michael Häusser, Luciano Floridi, Juan Pedro Bolaños, Guang‐Zhong Yang, Bertil Andersson, Martin Feelisch, William David Richardson and John Garthwaite.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact