Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom
Impact in
- Developmental Biology top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Marine animal studies overview
Papers in
- Ecology 380
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 205
- Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies 69
- Marine animal studies overview 52
- Avian ecology and behavior 38
- Top scholars
- Tim R. McClanahanJoël BergerAndrew C. BakerDavid W. MacdonaldColin A. ChapmanKent H. RedfordRobert B. WallaceJoseph Maina
- Journals
- Conservation Science and Practice (16 papers)Conservation Biology (13 papers)International Journal of Primatology (12 papers)Zootaxa (10 papers)Oryx (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom
574 papers receiving 19.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
- Developmental Biology 1.1k
- Ecology 12.3k
- Ecological Modeling 1.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 6.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom at the time of their publication.
About Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom have published 627 papers, which have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 37 papers in Developmental Biology, 380 papers in Ecology, 62 papers in Ecological Modeling, 115 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 168 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (205 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (69 papers), Marine and fisheries research (63 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (62 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (60 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (53 papers), Marine animal studies overview (52 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (1.1k citations), Ecology (12.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (6.0k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.2k citations). Authors at Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Conservation Science and Practice, Conservation Biology, International Journal of Primatology, Zootaxa and Oryx. Some of Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom's most productive authors include Tim R. McClanahan, Joël Berger, Andrew C. Baker, David W. Macdonald, Colin A. Chapman, Kent H. Redford, Robert B. Wallace, Joseph Maina, Lisa Naughton‐Treves and Adrian Treves.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.