VSL Dutch Metrology Institute
Impact in
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics top 2%
- Random lasers and scattering media
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Rare-earth and actinide compounds
Papers in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation 146
- Top scholars
- Henk W. J. BlöteM. P. NightingaleTheo M. NieuwenhuizenAd LagendijkJohn CardyN.J. TrappeniersGert RietveldDiederik S. Wiersma
- Journals
- Metrologia (103 papers)IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (64 papers)Physica B Condensed Matter (38 papers)Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (38 papers)Physical review. B, Condensed matter (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
VSL Dutch Metrology Institute
1.2k papers receiving 22.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 1.0k
- Condensed Matter Physics 4.2k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 5.9k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 977
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.2k
Countries citing scholars working at VSL Dutch Metrology Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at VSL Dutch Metrology Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at VSL Dutch Metrology Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites VSL Dutch Metrology Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at VSL Dutch Metrology Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with VSL Dutch Metrology Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with VSL Dutch Metrology Institute at the time of their publication.
About VSL Dutch Metrology Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with VSL Dutch Metrology Institute have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 23.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 21 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 150 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 197 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 273 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 64 papers in Radiation on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (146 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (135 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (91 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (70 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (69 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (66 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (60 papers) and Power Quality and Harmonics (59 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Acoustics and Ultrasonics (1.0k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (4.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (5.9k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (977 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.2k citations). Authors at VSL Dutch Metrology Institute collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Metrologia, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Physical review. B, Condensed matter. Some of VSL Dutch Metrology Institute's most productive authors include Henk W. J. Blöte, M. P. Nightingale, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen, Ad Lagendijk, John Cardy, N.J. Trappeniers, Gert Rietveld, Diederik S. Wiersma, H. Bakker and J. M. J. van Leeuwen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.