Veterinary Medicines Directorate

92.4k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Veterinary Medicines Directorate

2.0k papers receiving 89.6k citations

Peers

Veterinary Medicines Directorate
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 18.0k
  • Infectious Diseases 29.1k
  • Endocrinology 5.6k
  • Small Animals 7.9k
  • Microbiology 6.5k
Replace Animal and Plant Health Agency with:
Animal and Plant Health Agency United Kingdom
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail France
The Pirbright Institute United Kingdom
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control United Kingdom
Département Santé Animale France
Royal Agricultural University United Kingdom
Bipar France
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort France
Infectiologie et santé publique France
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Belgium
Veterinary Medicines Directorate relative to Animal and Plant Health Agency United Kingdom Animal and Plant Health Agency's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Animal and Plant Health Agency · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Veterinary Medicines Directorate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Veterinary Medicines Directorate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Veterinary Medicines Directorate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Medicines Directorate more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Veterinary Medicines Directorate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Veterinary Medicines Directorate at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Veterinary Medicines Directorate at the time of their publication.

About Veterinary Medicines Directorate

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Veterinary Medicines Directorate have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 92.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 221 papers in Microbiology, 365 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 594 papers in Infectious Diseases, 244 papers in Small Animals and 143 papers in Endocrinology on the topics of Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (338 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (289 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (282 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (231 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (228 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (224 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (211 papers) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (162 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (18.0k citations), Infectious Diseases (29.1k citations), Endocrinology (5.6k citations), Small Animals (7.9k citations) and Microbiology (6.5k citations). Authors at Veterinary Medicines Directorate collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Veterinary Record, Veterinary Microbiology, Avian Pathology, Journal of Comparative Pathology and Research in Veterinary Science. Some of Veterinary Medicines Directorate's most productive authors include D. J. Alexander, R. Glyn Hewinson, Martin J. Woodward, Ian H. Brown, Diane G. Newell, Roberto M. La Ragione, Robert Davies, David J. Paton, J. W. Wilesmith and R. Clifton‐Hadley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact