Melbourne Bioinformatics

596 papers receiving 43.8k citations

Peers

Melbourne Bioinformatics
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Molecular Medicine 4.3k
  • Endocrinology 3.2k
  • Microbiology 2.2k
  • Infectious Diseases 6.0k
  • Parasitology 2.2k
Replace Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry with:
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia
Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance Australia
AGRF Ltd Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology Australia
EMBL Australia Australia
Brien Holden Vision Institute Australia
Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology Australia
Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre Australia
Telstra (Australia) Australia
The Kinghorn Cancer Centre Australia
Melbourne Bioinformatics relative to Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.5×
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Melbourne Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Melbourne Bioinformatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Melbourne Bioinformatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melbourne Bioinformatics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Melbourne Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Melbourne Bioinformatics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Melbourne Bioinformatics at the time of their publication.

About Melbourne Bioinformatics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Melbourne Bioinformatics have published 639 papers, which have received a total of 46.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in Parasitology, 24 papers in Endocrinology, 83 papers in Infectious Diseases, 22 papers in Microbiology and 243 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (56 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (33 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (29 papers), Malaria Research and Control (28 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (26 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (24 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (23 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Medicine (4.3k citations), Endocrinology (3.2k citations), Microbiology (2.2k citations), Infectious Diseases (6.0k citations) and Parasitology (2.2k citations). Authors at Melbourne Bioinformatics collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Infection and Immunity, Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS neglected tropical diseases and Journal of Bacteriology. Some of Melbourne Bioinformatics's most productive authors include Torsten Seemann, James C. Whisstock, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Stéfan van der Walt, Emmanuelle Gouillart, Joshua Warner, Tony Yu, François Boulogne, Johannes L. Schönberger and Neil Yager.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact