Water Resources Research Centre

5.8k citations
260 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Water Resources Research Centre

255 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Water Resources Research Centre
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Environmental Chemistry 720
  • Spectroscopy 1.1k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 371
  • Water Science and Technology 873
  • Pollution 495
Replace Environmental Protection Agency with:
Environmental Protection Agency Denmark
Institute For Ecology of Industrial Areas Poland
Azienda Regionale per la protezione dell'ambiente Lombardia Italy
INGV Sezione di Roma 2
Institute of Groundwater Ecology Germany
European Environment Agency Denmark
Agenzia Regionale per la Prevenzione e Protezione Ambientale del Veneto Italy
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Sweden
Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland
Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Slovakia
Water Resources Research Centre relative to Environmental Protection Agency Denmark Environmental Protection Agency's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.4×
Environmental Protection Agency · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Water Resources Research Centre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Water Resources Research Centre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Water Resources Research Centre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Water Resources Research Centre more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Water Resources Research Centre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Water Resources Research Centre at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Water Resources Research Centre at the time of their publication.

About Water Resources Research Centre

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Water Resources Research Centre have published 260 papers, which have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 37 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 64 papers in Water Science and Technology, 31 papers in Pollution, 37 papers in Spectroscopy and 14 papers in Waste Management and Disposal on the topics of Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (28 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (24 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (17 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (16 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (15 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (15 papers) and Integrated Water Resources Management (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Environmental Chemistry (720 citations), Spectroscopy (1.1k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (371 citations), Water Science and Technology (873 citations) and Pollution (495 citations). Authors at Water Resources Research Centre collaborate with scholars in Hungary, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Water Science & Technology, Water Research, Journal of Hydrology, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry and Ground Water. Some of Water Resources Research Centre's most productive authors include János D. Pintér, Laszlo Somlyody, Peter Literathy, József Deák, Zoltán Juvancz, Zoltán Takáts, József Szejtli, Júlia Balog, Donald R. F. Harleman and Richard A. Luettich.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact