United States Census Bureau
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Firm Innovation and Growth
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Papers in
-
- Census and Population Estimation 197
- Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference 135
-
- Firm Innovation and Growth 138
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 109
- Top scholars
- John HaltiwangerZoltán J. ÁcsRon S. JarminJavier MirandaLarry H. LongRobert E. FayJohn IcelandNorman J. Johnson
- Journals
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (148 papers)Demography (82 papers)Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology (30 papers)American Economic Review (27 papers)Public Opinion Quarterly (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
United States Census Bureau
1.8k papers receiving 55.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Economics and Econometrics 18.0k
- Statistics and Probability 5.6k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.6k
- Gender Studies 4.1k
- Health 3.2k
Countries citing scholars working at United States Census Bureau
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Census Bureau. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Census Bureau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Census Bureau more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Census Bureau
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Census Bureau at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Census Bureau at the time of their publication.
About United States Census Bureau
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Census Bureau have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 63.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 436 papers in Statistics and Probability, 597 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 238 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 169 papers in Gender Studies and 137 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance on the topics of Census and Population Estimation (197 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (178 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (161 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (138 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (135 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (122 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (109 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (83 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (18.0k citations), Statistics and Probability (5.6k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (4.6k citations), Gender Studies (4.1k citations) and Health (3.2k citations). Authors at United States Census Bureau collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Statistical Association, Demography, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, American Economic Review and Public Opinion Quarterly. Some of United States Census Bureau's most productive authors include John Haltiwanger, Zoltán J. Ács, Ron S. Jarmin, Javier Miranda, Larry H. Long, Robert E. Fay, John Iceland, Norman J. Johnson, Randy A. Becker and Nathaniel Schenker.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.