University of South Carolina Aiken

844 papers receiving 27.2k citations

Peers

University of South Carolina Aiken
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 6.5k
  • Ecology 5.7k
  • Electrochemistry 1.3k
  • Oceanography 1.9k
  • Biotechnology 966
Replace University of South Carolina Sumter with:
University of South Carolina Sumter United States
South College United States
University of South Carolina Beaufort United States
St. Andrews University United States
University of North Carolina at Asheville United States
National Health Council United States
Linde (United States) United States
Duke Energy (United States) United States
Communities In Schools of Orange County United States
Life University United States
University of South Carolina Aiken relative to University of South Carolina Sumter United States University of South Carolina Sumter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
University of South Carolina Sumter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of South Carolina Aiken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of South Carolina Aiken. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of South Carolina Aiken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of South Carolina Aiken more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of South Carolina Aiken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of South Carolina Aiken at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of South Carolina Aiken at the time of their publication.

About University of South Carolina Aiken

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of South Carolina Aiken have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 28.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Research and Theory, 21 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 6 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 48 papers in Geometry and Topology and 56 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (43 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (28 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (25 papers), Graph theory and applications (24 papers), Marine and fisheries research (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers), Color perception and design (18 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (6.5k citations), Ecology (5.7k citations), Electrochemistry (1.3k citations), Oceanography (1.9k citations) and Biotechnology (966 citations). Authors at University of South Carolina Aiken collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Parasitology, Nurse Educator, PLoS ONE, The Journal of Social Studies Research and Behaviour Research and Therapy. Some of University of South Carolina Aiken's most productive authors include Chris A. Lucas, Vojislav R. Stamenković, Nenad M. Marković, Philip N. Ross, Bongjin Simon Mun, Garriet W. Smith, Ben Fowler, Guofeng Wang, Guofeng Wang and Matthias Arenz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact