United States Bureau of Reclamation

47.3k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Bureau of Reclamation

2.0k papers receiving 45.9k citations

Peers

United States Bureau of Reclamation
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Water Science and Technology 12.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 11.9k
  • Soil Science 5.2k
  • Ecology 12.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.6k
Replace United States Army Corps of Engineers with:
United States Army Corps of Engineers United States
United States Department of the Interior United States
Parsons (United States) United States
Joint Global Change Research Institute United States
Natural Resources Conservation Service United States
American Society of Civil Engineers United States
Bureau of Economic Analysis United States
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Canada
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center United States
Waters (United States) United States
United States Bureau of Reclamation relative to United States Army Corps of Engineers United States United States Army Corps of Engineers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
United States Army Corps of Engineers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Bureau of Reclamation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Bureau of Reclamation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Bureau of Reclamation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Bureau of Reclamation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Bureau of Reclamation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Bureau of Reclamation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Bureau of Reclamation at the time of their publication.

About United States Bureau of Reclamation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Bureau of Reclamation have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 47.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 501 papers in Water Science and Technology, 322 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 229 papers in Soil Science, 498 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 577 papers in Ecology on the topics of Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (369 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (326 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (270 papers), Hydraulic flow and structures (174 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (147 papers), Water resources management and optimization (101 papers), Dam Engineering and Safety (95 papers) and Hydrology and Drought Analysis (93 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Water Science and Technology (12.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (11.9k citations), Soil Science (5.2k citations), Ecology (12.2k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.6k citations). Authors at United States Bureau of Reclamation collaborate with scholars in United States, China and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Water Resources Research, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, North American Journal of Fisheries Management and Desalination. Some of United States Bureau of Reclamation's most productive authors include Tony L. Wahl, L. D. Brekke, S. Mark Nelson, Harold J. Gibbs, Lakhwinder S. Hundal, W. G. Holtz, Balaji Rajagopalan, Guanglong Tian, Yong G. Lai and T. Pruitt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact