University of Pennsylvania Health System

7.9k papers receiving 344k citations

Peers

University of Pennsylvania Health System
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Otorhinolaryngology 8.2k
  • Neurology 15.5k
  • Surgery 43.7k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 21.8k
  • Oncology 18.2k
Replace Thomas Jefferson University Hospital with:
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital United States
Children's National United States
Montefiore Medical Center United States
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center United States
New York Medical College United States
Northwell Health United States
University of Virginia Health System United States
University of Virginia Medical Center United States
Eastern Virginia Medical School United States
Georgetown University Medical Center United States
University of Pennsylvania Health System relative to Thomas Jefferson University Hospital United States Thomas Jefferson University Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Pennsylvania Health System

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Pennsylvania Health System. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Pennsylvania Health System with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Pennsylvania Health System more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Pennsylvania Health System

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Pennsylvania Health System at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Pennsylvania Health System at the time of their publication.

About University of Pennsylvania Health System

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Pennsylvania Health System have published 8.3k papers, which have received a total of 344.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Surgery, 149 papers in Otorhinolaryngology, 197 papers in Emergency Medicine, 54 papers in Health Informatics and 530 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (133 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (123 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (114 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (107 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (99 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (88 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (82 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (80 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Otorhinolaryngology (8.2k citations), Neurology (15.5k citations), Surgery (43.7k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (21.8k citations) and Oncology (18.2k citations). Authors at University of Pennsylvania Health System collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Gynecologic Oncology, JAMA Network Open, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Journal of General Internal Medicine. Some of University of Pennsylvania Health System's most productive authors include Mitchell A. Lazar, James M. Wilson, Kurt Thomas Barnhart, Francis E. Marchlinski, Daniel James Rader, Felix Werner Wehrli, Craig A. Umscheid, Alan J. Wein, Jerome F. Strauss and Virginia M.‐Y. Lee.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact