Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
Impact in
- Horticulture top 10%
- Paleontology top 10%
Papers in
- Horticulture 23
- Paleontology 134
- Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography 83
- Top scholars
- Guillermo IbáñezMiguel Ángel Pérez‐FarreraAlma Rosa González‐EsquincaVeymar G. Tacias-PascacioRoberto Fernández‐LafuenteDaniel Villafuerte SolísP.J. SebastiánJoel Moreira
- Journals
- Phytotaxa (17 papers)Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics (12 papers)Zootaxa (11 papers)Sustainability (10 papers)International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
1.1k papers receiving 10.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
- Horticulture 194
- Paleontology 669
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.7k
- Ecological Modeling 367
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 917
Countries citing scholars working at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas at the time of their publication.
About Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 23 papers in Horticulture, 134 papers in Paleontology, 49 papers in Ecological Modeling, 212 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 85 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences on the topics of Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (83 papers), Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (69 papers), Plant and animal studies (63 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (63 papers), Plant and soil sciences (58 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (55 papers), Agricultural and Food Production Studies (54 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (53 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (194 citations), Paleontology (669 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (367 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (917 citations). Authors at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas collaborate with scholars in Mexico, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, Zootaxa, Sustainability and International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. Some of Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas's most productive authors include Guillermo Ibáñez, Miguel Ángel Pérez‐Farrera, Alma Rosa González‐Esquinca, Veymar G. Tacias-Pascacio, Roberto Fernández‐Lafuente, Daniel Villafuerte Solís, P.J. Sebastián, Joel Moreira, Andrew P. Vovides and Joel Pantoja.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.