Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
Impact in
-
- Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
-
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
-
- Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean 55
-
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies 39
- Top scholars
- Guillermo IbáñezMiguel Ángel Pérez‐FarreraAlma Rosa González‐EsquincaVeymar Guadalupe Tacias-PascacioRoberto Fernández‐LafuenteJoel PantojaPathiyamattom Joseph SebastianÁngel Berenguer‐Murcia
- Journals
- Phytotaxa (17 papers)Zootaxa (12 papers)Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics (12 papers)Sustainability (11 papers)International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
1.2k papers receiving 11.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
- Biochemistry 338
- Aquatic Science 341
- Ecological Modeling 104
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 420
Countries citing scholars working at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas at the time of their publication.
About Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 133 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 52 papers in Aquatic Science, 18 papers in Ecological Modeling, 43 papers in Biochemistry and 61 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (55 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (45 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (43 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (42 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (39 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (38 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (34 papers) and Historical Studies in Central America (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations), Biochemistry (338 citations), Aquatic Science (341 citations), Ecological Modeling (104 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (420 citations). Authors at Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas collaborate with scholars in Mexico, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Zootaxa, Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, Sustainability and International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. Some of Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas's most productive authors include Guillermo Ibáñez, Miguel Ángel Pérez‐Farrera, Alma Rosa González‐Esquinca, Veymar Guadalupe Tacias-Pascacio, Roberto Fernández‐Lafuente, Joel Pantoja, Pathiyamattom Joseph Sebastian, Ángel Berenguer‐Murcia, Joel Moreira and Andrew P. Vovides.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.