University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe
Impact in
-
- Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Papers in
-
- Business and Management Studies 51
- Top scholars
- Claudriana LocatelliTânia Beatriz Creczynski‐PasaFabíola Branco Filippin-MonteiroLuiz Alberto FernandesLuiz Carlos ArgentaMarcelo CabidoDiego E. GurvichJames P. Mattheis
- Journals
- Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (4 papers)Journal of Ethnopharmacology (3 papers)Agronomy (2 papers)Horticulturae (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe
290 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 62
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 216
- Biochemistry 82
- Plant Science 434
- Forestry 36
Countries citing scholars working at University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe at the time of their publication.
About University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe have published 507 papers, which have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 52 papers in Information Systems and Management, 17 papers in Occupational Therapy, 53 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 17 papers in Health Information Management and 15 papers in Forestry on the topics of Business and Management Studies (51 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (46 papers), Environmental Sustainability and Education (40 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (25 papers), Academic Research in Diverse Fields (23 papers), Education and Public Policy (20 papers), Science and Education Research (19 papers) and Healthcare Regulation (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (62 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (216 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations), Plant Science (434 citations) and Forestry (36 citations). Authors at University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Agronomy, Horticulturae and PLoS ONE. Some of University Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe's most productive authors include Claudriana Locatelli, Tânia Beatriz Creczynski‐Pasa, Fabíola Branco Filippin-Monteiro, Luiz Alberto Fernandes, Luiz Carlos Argenta, Marcelo Cabido, Diego E. Gurvich, James P. Mattheis, Sandra Dı́az and Xuetong Fan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.