United Nations Development Programme

999 papers receiving 25.1k citations

Peers

United Nations Development Programme
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Business and International Management 413
  • Development 752
  • Global and Planetary Change 4.0k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2.0k
  • Safety Research 1.3k
Replace American Association For The Advancement of Science with:
American Association For The Advancement of Science United States
Office of International Affairs United States
International Development Research Centre Canada
World Resources Institute United States
Ford Foundation United States
Futures Group (United States) United States
Institute on Governance Canada
Wagner College United States
Economic Policy Institute United States
Environmental Defense Fund United States
United Nations Development Programme relative to American Association For The Advancement of Science United States American Association For The Advancement of Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
American Association For The Advancement of Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United Nations Development Programme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations Development Programme. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations Development Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations Development Programme more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations Development Programme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations Development Programme at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations Development Programme at the time of their publication.

About United Nations Development Programme

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations Development Programme have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 28.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 68 papers in Development, 63 papers in Safety Research, 14 papers in Business and International Management, 67 papers in Soil Science and 83 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of International Development and Aid (63 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (58 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (52 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (47 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (47 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (43 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (41 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (37 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Business and International Management (413 citations), Development (752 citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.0k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (2.0k citations) and Safety Research (1.3k citations). Authors at United Nations Development Programme collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, World Development, Development Policy Review and Development and Change. Some of United Nations Development Programme's most productive authors include Jeni Klugman, David Le Blanc, Kevin Watkins, Khalid Malik, Inge Kaul, N. S. Scrimshaw, Sakiko Fukuda‐Parr, John Paul SanGiovanni, Aldicìr Scariot and Daniel Luís Mascia Vieira.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact