United Nations Development Programme
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Papers in
- Development 64
- International Development and Aid 59
- Top scholars
- David Le BlancInge KaulN. S. ScrimshawSakiko Fukuda‐ParrJohn Paul SanGiovanniAldicir Osni ScariotLuis Felipe López-CalvaDaniel Luís Mascia Vieira
- Journals
- The Lancet (15 papers)World Development (11 papers)BMJ (9 papers)Journal of Human Development and Capabilities (8 papers)Public Administration and Development (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
United Nations Development Programme
942 papers receiving 25.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Business and International Management 479
- Global and Planetary Change 4.5k
- Development 687
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2.1k
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.3k
Countries citing scholars working at United Nations Development Programme
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations Development Programme. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations Development Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations Development Programme more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations Development Programme
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations Development Programme at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations Development Programme at the time of their publication.
About United Nations Development Programme
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations Development Programme have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 29.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 64 papers in Development, 15 papers in Business and International Management, 60 papers in Safety Research, 68 papers in Soil Science and 82 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Income, Poverty, and Inequality (60 papers), International Development and Aid (59 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (53 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (51 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (50 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (48 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (35 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Business and International Management (479 citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.5k citations), Development (687 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (2.1k citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (1.3k citations). Authors at United Nations Development Programme collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including The Lancet, World Development, BMJ, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities and Public Administration and Development. Some of United Nations Development Programme's most productive authors include David Le Blanc, Inge Kaul, N. S. Scrimshaw, Sakiko Fukuda‐Parr, John Paul SanGiovanni, Aldicir Osni Scariot, Luis Felipe López-Calva, Daniel Luís Mascia Vieira, Juha I. Uitto and Ronald Umali Mendoza.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.